The park is the largest block of intact lowland forest in the Congo Basin and it is accessible only by water or air. It is part of the Salonga–Lukenie–Sankuru Landscape, which extends over an area of 104,205km² and is one of the 12 priority landscapes of the Congo Basin Forests Partnership (CBFP). Almost 95% of the landscape is covered by forest: dense forests make up 70% and flooded forests and swamps 23%.
BiodiversitySalonga is home to a rich biodiversity, including forest elephants, bonobos, bongos, giant pangolins, and the indigenous Congo peacock.
Despite the park’s enormous size and apparent inaccessibility, and the fact that it has been largely untouched by civil wars and security issues, wildlife populations have been hit hard during the past two decades. Several large navigable rivers provide access deep into the park. On the one hand, the needs of the human population in the immediate area, coupled with the huge demand for food in urban centres as far as Kinshasa, have driven bushmeat hunting and fishing in Salonga to critical levels. On the other hand, elephant poaching has in recent years once more become a highly lucrative business, prompted by the skyrocketing ivory prices on international markets.
Insufficient management capacity, corruption, and the virtual lack of infrastructure have made it extremely difficult for park authorities and their partners to efficiently tackle these challenges.
Since 1999, Salonga is on the list of World Heritage Sites in Danger.
PeopleSalonga National Park is composed of two blocks (North and South) separated by the 45 km-wide Monkoto corridor. This is where a large number of people who resided within the park perimeter before its creation in 1970 were subsequently resettled.
The density of human populations on the periphery of the park is relatively low: it is estimated to be at most 3 inhabitants per km². The landscape is populated mainly by the Mongo, who are one of the largest ethnic groups in the country, represented by the subgroups Nkundo, Ndengese, Yaelima, and Isolu. Other groups include the Mbole and the Twa pygmies.
Despite the relatively low human population density, still over 600 villages are located within 50 km of the park boundaries, with main concentrations in the urban centres of Oshwe, Dekese, Boende, Inongo, Bokungu and Monkoto.
Salonga is larger than Belgium and almost four times the size of Yellowstone NP. It was named after Salonga River, whose name, in turn, is said to come from the mispronunciation of a bird locally known as "nsao'loonga".
WWF in Salonga
Since 2004, WWF has held the lead for the Salonga Landscape programme financed by USAID firstly through CARPE (Central African Regional Programme For the Environment) and since 2013 through CAFEC (Central African Forest Ecosystem Conservation). These programmes bring together ICCN and several conservation NGOs and financial partners with the objective to preserve the ecological integrity of the humid forest ecosystem. As the Salonga Landscape provides both a vital ecological refuge for the park’s biodiversity and an important carbon sink recognized through the National REDD+ Strategy, consortium activities dually focus on scalable climate change goals and biodiversity goals, achievable through successful long-term park management and land-use planning.
In August 2015, WWF and ICCN signed a three year co-management agreement for Salonga NP and its periphery. Moving towards a long-term co-management structure was imperative in order to achieve scalable results, as previous investments and the existing governance and management structures have proven insufficient to have real impact on continuing trends of ecological degradation. CAFEC funding will continue to support community development and basic park management, while increased funding from the EU and KfW (German Cooperation) in the coming years will contribute to the recruitment of key staff, improved infrastructure and logistics to ensure the park’s protection, while also ensuring livelihoods for the people in and around the park.
- Salonga is removed from the list of World Heritage Sites in danger
- Salonga remains forever the largest intact forest block in Africa, with thriving wildlife
- Ensure engagement with local communities and the government now human pressure is still low as human growth projection is that pressure will come
- Innovative governance and Protected Area management system
- Innovative funding mechanisms using Carbon based funding sources to supply a Trustfund
- Salonga Management Plan elaborated and awaiting validation
- Increased anti-poaching capacity and patrol coverage (up to 50% of the Park in 2015)
- Successful introduction of SMART (Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool) to support anti-poaching efforts
- Constituency building through:
- implication of communities in natural resource management
- promotion of common goods
- awareness raising on importance of sustainable use of natural resources and national laws
- Ensure proper management and protection of the park and its biodiversity by building ICCN capacity
- Improve the state of knowledge on biodiversity and prevent potential losses
- Reduce the illegal trade of bushmeat and endangered species
- Enhance law enforcement and prosecution
- Educate and engage institutions, communities and representatives of the private sector in sustainable use of natural resources and provide sustainable development alternatives.
- Reduce the illegal trade of protected and threatened species
- Raise awareness and get public participation in the effort to preserve the biological diversity of the landscape and the sustainable use of natural resources
- Reduce the rate of deforestation and loss of biodiversity by building natural resource management capacity
- Reduce community reliance on wildlife exploitation by diversifying economic opportunities
- Develop community land tenure and alternative livelihoods programmes for communities within the REDD+ project boundary.
Direct threats1. Uncontrolled hunting for bushmeat trade
2. Uncontrolled fishing
3. Targeted poaching of elephants for ivory
4. Habitat destruction and fragmentation
Indirect threats1. Very remote and large, hence expensive to access and run
2. Weak law enforcement
3. Weak stakeholder commitment
4. Lack of regulations for human populations living in the park
5. Incomplete park limit demarcation